Brand Safety Considerations And Google’s Search Partner Network
Google’s Search Partner Network is included by default on most search campaigns, and most advertisers running it have no idea where the money actually lands. A 2026 finding about programmatic inventory on X (formerly Twitter) shows the blind spot hasn’t closed.
Most search campaigns run with a setting most advertisers have never consciously reviewed: Google Search Partners, a network of third-party sites and platforms bundled into standard Search and Performance Max campaigns by default. It’s a real placement inventory with real brand safety implications, and it’s opted in unless someone deliberately opts it out.
What the Search Partner Network actually is
Google’s Search Partner Network (SPN, sometimes referenced as GSP) extends search ad delivery beyond Google’s own results pages to a network of thousands of partner sites and services. It’s bundled by default into most Search and Performance Max campaign types, with a pre-filled checkbox that most advertisers never uncheck. Google offers advertisers a spend breakdown between Search and SPN in aggregate, but historically has not provided a site-level breakdown of exactly where SPN spend lands, which is the core of the transparency complaint.
What the original brand safety research found
Independent ad-tech research firm Adalytics published a 2023 report estimating SPN generates roughly $10.5 billion annually and alleging the network included placements on pornographic, piracy and sanctioned-entity sites, in some documented cases on domains advertisers had specifically added to their own exclusion lists years earlier. Google disputed the scale of the findings but responded by giving advertisers the ability to exclude the Search Partner Network from campaigns entirely, an option that previously required digging through account settings most advertisers didn’t know to look for.
What made the original report land as hard as it did wasn’t just the specific sites named, it was that Search and Search Partner Network spend weren’t reported separately by default, and Google Search and SPN inventory aren’t Media Ratings Council accredited for brand safety the way most premium display and video inventory now is. Advertisers were, in effect, being asked to trust a network with genuine reach and genuine revenue at stake without the independent verification standard most other channels had already adopted as table stakes.
Need to put a number on your next media decision?
Model the impact of a media or marketing decision on your own numbers, browse the full library of strategic calculators and decision tools, and get definitions straight on the industry terms that come up along the way, three free resources, ready whenever you need them.
Why this is still a live issue, not settled history
The 2023 findings could be read as a moment that got fixed and moved past. A specific development from January 2026 argues otherwise: martech consultant Jonathan D’Souza-Rauto documented that a substantial share of the ad auctions on X (formerly Twitter) are now available programmatically, with Google Ads serving as a primary buyer of that inventory through Search Partners, Video Partners, and Display Network extensions on Performance Max, Demand Gen and Display campaigns. Brands with explicit policies against advertising on X can end up buying inventory there anyway, indirectly, through a Google Ads account they assumed was compliant with that policy, often because the cheap CPMs available on that inventory get favoured by automated optimisation. Third-party pre-screening tools for SPN inventory, including a product DoubleVerify launched in May 2025 specifically for this network, exist precisely because Google’s own settings don’t close this gap on their own.
What to actually check in your own account
Three things worth confirming directly rather than assuming: whether Search Partners is currently enabled on active campaigns, whether it’s enabled by default on new campaign creation (it typically is), and whether any current brand exclusion policy, X (formerly Twitter) included, has a technical control behind it in the ad account itself rather than existing only as a stated internal policy nobody’s actually verified against delivery data.
Free Playbook
The FSI Marketing Playbook covers building placement vetting standards suited to regulated and reputation-sensitive advertising, including default settings that quietly work against stated brand policy.
Get the FSI Marketing Playbook- Adweek, “Google Search Ads End Up on Pornographic and Sanctioned Sites” (28 November 2023) – the original Adalytics research on Google’s Search Partner Network
- DoubleVerify, “DoubleVerify Launches Pre-Screen Safety and Suitability Solution for Google’s Search Partner Network (SPN)” (8 May 2025)
- MediaPost, “X Loophole: Why Google Ads May Still Appear There” (8 January 2026) – reporting on Jonathan D’Souza-Rauto’s findings on programmatic X inventory purchased through Google Ads
Brand Safety and Google’s Search Partner Network: FAQ
Is the Search Partner Network enabled by default?
Yes, on most Search and Performance Max campaign types, it’s included unless an advertiser or their agency specifically excludes it in campaign settings.
Can advertisers see exactly which sites their Search Partner ads appeared on?
Google provides an aggregate spend split between Search and Search Partners, but has not historically offered a full site-level breakdown, which is the specific transparency gap third-party verification tools are built to address.
Does having a policy against advertising on a specific platform protect against appearing there?
Not automatically. A stated policy needs a corresponding technical control in the ad account, exclusion settings or verified campaign configuration, or automated optimisation across Google’s ad products can still route spend there indirectly.
